It is time to factually clarify the legal
status of Judea
and Samaria
under international law.
"When the occupant is not the one you want to believe in"
In 1967 Israel liberated occupied
Jewish Palestinian territories. For the enemies of Israel and many of Its’
friends, and for a majority of Israelis, this is a basic axiom. During the Six
Day War, it is stated that Israel liberated and
captured the Jewish Palestinian territories, resettled and installed there Its’
“settlers” with impunity and in obvious violation of international law. Is
this axiom a lie? If international law asserts the
exact opposite, for obvious political and diplomatic reasons, then the facts
have been ignored and have instead embraced the current unfounded and false
Arab propaganda. This understanding is a misconception and false.
It is time to clarify and illustrate the Jewish legal status of Judea and Samaria under international law. One only has to read the documents. However,
the Media has without a doubt, immersed itself in hearsay and untruths,
twisting facts and ignoring the truth. It is time to examine the real
truth and facts as supported by documents and history.
We hardly talk
about it, yet, when looking at historical documents on the legal status of The San Remo Treaty of 1920, written almost a century ago, forms the foundation of truth. Yet, it seems hardly anyone in the Prime Minister's office, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, or Hasbara has taken the time to build a strategy based on said Treaty and other documents which followed that prove clearly that
When considering the media archives that preceded the Oslo Accords, we realize that the official Israeli narrative concerning the Israeli presence in the
According to Prof. Eliav Cho'hatman, lawyer and lecturer at the Graduate Institute of Law "Shaare Mishpat," there is no doubt that the Oslo Accords marked the starting point of this attitude it deems "catastrophic": "Until then, our leaders did not hesitate to brag our rights over all the land of Israel from the point of view of international law but since the agreements were signed, only security patterns are referred to plead that part of these territories we are entitled to remain in our hands." Prof. Cho'hatman says he sent to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu during his first term (1996-1999), his work on the above, but regrets that the head of government has not availed itself: "When I heard of two states for two peoples, I understood why."
To understand this issue, we must examine Balfour Declaration and San Remo Treaty, a little less than a century ago,
Three years after the Balfour Declaration in 1920, the conference was held in
The
In paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of the Protocol of
Finally, the Palestine Mandate states: "the Administration of Palestine is responsible for the adoption of a law on nationality. Included in this law must be provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who acquire permanent residence in
What happens next is related to internal political changes in
The creation of
According to many lawyers, including Prof. Dr. Cho'hatman with Talya Einhoren, and American lawyer Eugene Rostov, one of the drafters of the famous U.N. Resolution 242 which is the partition plan of
The Jordanian occupation
Did the Jewish people temporarily lose the rights to
The dissolution of the
Does the dissolution of the
For Professor Eugene Rostov, mentioned above, this means that "the right of the Jewish people to settle in the
No unilateral approaches
Did the
Do not just be right, but also know
There are other arguments for the legitimacy of the Jewish presence in
Yet these arguments are not raised. The reasons? There are many:
The Jewish and Arab Refugee resolution Since the late 1940's the Arab States have expelled over a million Jewish people. They confiscated their assets, businesses, homes and Real Estate which is 120,000 Sq, Km. (about 5-6 times the size of
YJ Draiman
P.S. "who controls the energy supply
controls whole continents";
"who controls water sources controls life". "Who controls the food supply controls the people"; "who controls money controls the world";
"who controls water sources controls life". "Who controls the food supply controls the people"; "who controls money controls the world";
The diminishing political weapon of Arab oil
as U.S. retakes the lead as
the largest produces. The price drop of oil by 50% since July 2014 and Israel 's entry as a
potential powerhouse in energy development. Additionally the new technology for
Shale extraction has helped other countries develop their own oil sources. The
advancements in renewable energy and alternative sources of energy have
decreased reliance on Oil. These oil glut and price drop will have a major
affect on the Arab countries political power and Russia 's diminishing
financial strength.
"In 1988, King Hussein decided to sever the ties
between Jordan and the West Bank.
Before 1988 all West Bank Palestinians held 5-year Jordanian passports and were
considered Jordanian citizens. After 1988, all West Bank Palestinians became
stateless.
According to the 1988
decision, all Palestinians who were living in the West Bank before 1 August 1988 were Palestinian nationals. The declaration also
stated that all
the leaders of the PLO are not Jordanians but Palestinians."
the leaders of the PLO are not Jordanians but Palestinians."
Add this:
"In July 1988, at the height of the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising, against Israeli military occupation, the late King Hussein decided to sever "administrative and legal" ties with theWest Bank . The motivations behind that decision, as well as its
constitutionality, remain disputed, but include a sharp decline in Jordan 's economic fortunes at the time, and the growing
international recognition of the Palestinian Liberation Organization as the
representative of the Palestinian people. King Hussein explained his decision
as one of deference to Palestinian wishes for national autonomy.
"In July 1988, at the height of the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising, against Israeli military occupation, the late King Hussein decided to sever "administrative and legal" ties with the
One consequence of this
severing of ties with the West
Bank was that Jordanians of
Palestinian origin residing in the West Bank at that
time lost their Jordanian nationality."
http://reliefweb.int/report/jo...
http://reliefweb.int/report/jo...
The territory Jordan conquered in 1948 remained under Jordanian
control until 1967 when it again launched an unprovoked attack on Israel . This time however Israel was not only strong enough to repel the
attack but it was strong enough to expel the Jordanians from all the territory
they had previously conquered and thus Israel was able to liberate all the previously
occupied territories including East Jerusalem .
These territories thatIsrael liberated from Jordanian occupation in 1967
are what the Arab nations, and after four and a half decades of propaganda, the
whole world, calls ‘occupied territories’. They are in fact liberated
territories.
East Jerusalem was not ‘occupied’ by Israel in 1967 any more than Paris was ‘occupied’ by the French and the
allies in the 2nd world war. Both Paris and Jerusalem were liberated from enemy occupation. Israel liberated East Jerusalem from Jordanian occupation in the same way
the allies liberated Paris from German occupation. Israel was not in control of East Jerusalem prior to 1967 because Jordan launched an unprovoked attack on Israel (with the stated aim of wiping Israel off the map) and at that stage was
stronger than Israel .
‘Liberated’ is another story in a word, and it is the story of what actually happened, not a lie.
When in 1967Israel ejected the Jordanians from the
territories they had occupied for 19 years, both it and its supporters failed
to continually refer to the newly liberated territories as ‘liberated’. This
has aided the Arabs in setting the narrative agenda.
I suggest therefore that where appropriate whenever the words East Jerusalem and ‘Territories’ are used, we should use the adjective ‘liberated’ to describe them. With the use of this one little word, hopefully we can retell the story of what happened as it really happened. We can help correct the lies and deceptions of the false narrative.
We are trying to correct the record more than four and a half decades late, after more than four and a half decades of propaganda, but perhaps if enough people use the word ‘liberate’ often enough it will somewhat neutralize the current narrative. It is only a little thing but let us hope it is not too little too late.
These territories that
‘Liberated’ is another story in a word, and it is the story of what actually happened, not a lie.
When in 1967
I suggest therefore that where appropriate whenever the words East Jerusalem and ‘Territories’ are used, we should use the adjective ‘liberated’ to describe them. With the use of this one little word, hopefully we can retell the story of what happened as it really happened. We can help correct the lies and deceptions of the false narrative.
We are trying to correct the record more than four and a half decades late, after more than four and a half decades of propaganda, but perhaps if enough people use the word ‘liberate’ often enough it will somewhat neutralize the current narrative. It is only a little thing but let us hope it is not too little too late.
Oil as a political weapon
The Middle East's declining strategic importance is likely to affect Israel-U.S. relations, which would change once theU.S. no longer
needs the region's oil, thus significantly diminishing the Arab nations' clout.
TheU.S. withdrawal
strategies from the region may even affect how the Middle Eastern countries
band together against common enemies.
Israel is the strongest and most stable country in the region, and it has
proved itself to be a reliable ally, but it is still plagued by the ongoing
conflict with the Palestinians.
It is the ratio between any progress made in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, the volume of regional threats, and the scope of mutual interests -- defeating radical Islam, a nuclear Iran and prolonged unrest -- that will eventually dictate the nature of the relationships Israel forges in a theater from which the U.S. is seeking slowly but surely to distance itself.
Israel is becoming an energy powerhouse with new discoveries of Natural Gas
and Shale Oil.
Israel 's current reserves of Natural Gas is the largest in the Middle East .
The Middle East's declining strategic importance is likely to affect Israel-U.S. relations, which would change once the
The
It is the ratio between any progress made in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, the volume of regional threats, and the scope of mutual interests -- defeating radical Islam, a nuclear Iran and prolonged unrest -- that will eventually dictate the nature of the relationships Israel forges in a theater from which the U.S. is seeking slowly but surely to distance itself.
"Who controls the food supply controls the people";
"who controls the energy supply controls whole continents";
"who controls money controls the world";
"who controls water sources controls life".
"who controls the energy supply controls whole continents";
"who controls money controls the world";
"who controls water sources controls life".
The diminishing
political weapon of Arab oil as U.S. retakes the lead as the largest produces. The price drop of oil
by 50% since July 2014 and Israel 's entry as a potential powerhouse in energy development.
Additionally the new technology for Shale extraction has helped other countries
develop their own oil sources. These oil glut and price drop will have a major
affect on the Arab countries political power and Russia 's diminishing financial strength.
Oil as a political weapon
The Middle East's declining strategic importance is likely to affect Israel-U.S. relations, which would change once theU.S. no longer needs the region's oil, thus significantly
diminishing the Arab nations' clout.
TheU.S. withdrawal strategies from the region may even affect how the
Middle Eastern countries band together against common enemies.
Israel is the strongest and most stable country in the region, and it
has proved itself to be a reliable ally, but it is still plagued by the ongoing
conflict with the Palestinians.
It is the ratio between any progress made in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, the volume of regional threats, and the scope of mutual interests -- defeating radical Islam, a nuclear Iran and prolonged unrest -- that will eventually dictate the nature of the relationships Israel forges in a theater from which the U.S. is seeking slowly but surely to distance itself.
Israel is becoming an energy powerhouse with new discoveries of
Natural Gas and Shale Oil.
Israel 's current reserves of Natural Gas is the largest in the Middle East .
The Middle East's declining strategic importance is likely to affect Israel-U.S. relations, which would change once the
The
It is the ratio between any progress made in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, the volume of regional threats, and the scope of mutual interests -- defeating radical Islam, a nuclear Iran and prolonged unrest -- that will eventually dictate the nature of the relationships Israel forges in a theater from which the U.S. is seeking slowly but surely to distance itself.
"who controls the energy supply controls whole continents";
"who controls water sources controls life". "Who controls the food supply controls the people"; "who controls money controls the world";
The diminishing political weapon of Arab oil
as U.S. retakes the lead as
the largest produces. The price drop of oil by 50% since July 2014 and Israel 's entry as a
potential powerhouse in energy development. Additionally the new technology for
Shale extraction has helped other countries develop their own oil sources. The
advancements in renewable energy and alternative sources of energy have
decreased reliance on Oil. These oil glut and price drop will have a major
affect on the Arab countries political power and Russia 's diminishing
financial strength.
allow
permit
induce
encourage
atrocities
Unknown to most of the world population, the origin of the
"Palestinian" Arabs' claim to the Israel-Palestine Land spans
a period of a meager 30-50 years
At the beginning of the 20th century,
there were practically no Arabs in the Holy Land . Historically, a
"Palestinian" people never existed. The English name
"Palestinian", to describe the local Arab population, was invented
AFTER the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. These Arabs
do not even have a native name to describe themselves in their own Arabic
language. The Arabs who now claim to be natives of the Holy Land have migrated to Palestine and invaded the land
after 1917, from neighboring Arab countries. There is only one possible
solution to the "Palestinians" desire for a homeland - let them
return to where they came from - to where they lived earlier for hundreds or
thousands of years - to their real homeland in their original Arab countries.
Unknown to most of the world population, the origin of the
"Palestinian" Arabs' claim to the Holy
Land spans a period of a meager 30 years - a drop in
the bucket compared to the thousands of years of the region's rich history.
At the beginning of the 20th century, there were practically no Muslim Arabs in theHoly
Land . By contrast, the Jews, despite 2000 years of
persecution and forced conversions by various conquerors, have throughout most
of history been the majority population there. In Jerusalem Jews were always
the largest demographic group [1][2],
except for periods when conquerors specifically threw them out and prevented
them from returning.
When General Allenby, the commander of the British military forces, conqueredPalestine in
1917/1918, only a few thousand Muslim Arabs resided in the Holy
Land . Most of the Arabs were Christians, and most of
the Muslims in the area either came from Turkey under
the Ottoman Empire , or
were the descendants of Jews and Christians who were forcefully converted to
Islam by the Muslim conquerors. These Muslims were not of Arab origin. Most
references to Arabs in Palestine before
1917 refer to the Christian Arabs, not to the Muslims.
It is important to note that estimates and censuses conducted by the Muslim conquerors were biased. Therefore, the only reliable data is provided by non-Muslim sources. Tourists and politicians, Arabs and non-Arabs alike, have documented their observations of the population in theHoly Land
beginning more that a thousand years ago. Let's start at the early days and
continue into the Ottoman period:
At the beginning of the 20th century, there were practically no Muslim Arabs in the
When General Allenby, the commander of the British military forces, conquered
It is important to note that estimates and censuses conducted by the Muslim conquerors were biased. Therefore, the only reliable data is provided by non-Muslim sources. Tourists and politicians, Arabs and non-Arabs alike, have documented their observations of the population in the
§
The historian James Parkes wrote: "During the first century
after the Arab conquest [670-740 CE], the caliph and governors of Syria and the Holy Land ruled entirely over
Christian and Jewish subjects. Apart from the Bedouin in the earliest days, the
only Arabs west of the Jordan were the garrisons."[3]
§
In year 985 the Arab writer Muqaddasi complained: "the mosque
is empty of worshipers... The Jews constitute the majority of Jerusalem ’s population" (The
entire city of Jerusalem had only one
mosque?). [4]
§
In 1377, Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable Arab historians,
wrote: "Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel extended over 1400
years... It was the Jews who implanted the culture and customs of the permanent
settlement".[5]
§
In 1695-1696, the Dutch scholar and cartographer, Adriaan Reland
(Hadriani Relandi) , wrote reports about visits to the Holy Land . (There are those who
claim that he did not personally visit the Holy land but collected reports
from other visitors.) He was fluent in Hebrew and Arabic. He documented visits
to many locations. He writes: The names of settlements were mostly
Hebrew, some Greek, and some Latin-Roman. No settlement had an original Muslim-Arab
name with a historical root in its location. Most of the land was empty,
desolate, and the inhabitants few in number and mostly concentrated in Jerusalem , Acco, Tzfat, Jaffa , Tiberius and Gaza . Most of the
inhabitants were Jews and the rest Christians. There were few Muslims, mostly
nomad Bedouins. The Arabs were predominantly Christians with a tiny minority of
Muslims. In Jerusalem there were
approximately 5000 people, mostly Jews and some Christians. In Nazareth there were
approximately 700 people - all Christians. In Gaza there were
approximately 550 people - half of them Jews and half Christians. Um-El-Phachem
was a village of 10 families - all Christians. The only exception was Nablus with 120 Muslims from
the Natsha family and approximately 70 Shomronites.[6]
§
In 1835 Alphonse de Lamartine wrote: "Outside the city of Jerusalem , we saw no living
object, heard no living sound. . .a complete eternal silence reigns in the
town, in the highways, in the country."[7]
§
In 1844, William Thackeray writes about the road from Jaffa to Jerusalem : "Now the district
is quite deserted, and you ride among what seem to be so many petrified
waterfalls. We saw no animals moving among the stony brakes; scarcely even a
dozen little birds in the whole course of the ride."[8]
§
In 1857, the British consul in Palestine , James Finn, reported:
"The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants and
therefore its greatest need is that of a body of population."[9]
§
In 1866, W.M. Thomson writes: "How melancholy is this utter
desolation. Not a house, not a trace of inhabitants, not even shepherds, to
relieve the dull monotony ... Much of the country through which we have
been rambling for a week appears never to have been inhabited, or even
cultivated; and there are other parts, you say, still more barren."[10]
§
In 1867, Mark Twain - Samuel Clemens, the famous author of
"Huckleberry Finn" and "Tom Sawyer", toured the Holy Land . This is how he
described the land: "There is not a solitary village throughout its whole
extent; not for thirty miles in either direction... One may ride ten miles
hereabouts and not see ten human beings ... Nazareth is forlorn... Jericho lies a mouldering
ruin... Bethlehem and Bethany , in their poverty and
humiliation... untenanted by any living creature... A desolate country
whose soil is rich enough but is given over wholly to weeds. A silent, mournful
expanse. We never saw a human being on the whole route. There was hardly a tree
or a shrub anywhere. Even the olive and the cactus, those fast friends of a
worthless soil, had almost deserted the country."[11]
§
In 1874, Reverend Samuel Manning wrote: "But where were the
inhabitants? This fertile plain, which might support an immense population, is
almost a solitude.... Day by day we were to learn afresh the lesson now forced
upon us, that the denunciations of ancient prophecy have been fulfilled to the
very letter -- "the land is left void and desolate and without
inhabitants." (Jeremiah, ch.44 v.22)[12]
§
In 1892, B. W. Johnson writes: "In the portion of the plain
between Mount Carmel and Jaffa one sees but rarely a
village or other sights of human life... A ride of half an hour more brought us
to the ruins of the ancient city of Cæsarea , once a city of two
hundred thousand inhabitants, and the Roman capital of Palestine , but now entirely
deserted... I laid upon my couch at night, to listen to the moaning of the
waves and to think of the desolation around us."[13]
§
In 1913, a British report, by the Palestinian Royal Commission,
quotes an account of the conditions on the coastal plain along the Mediterranean Sea : "The road leading
from Gaza to the north was only a summer track,
suitable for transport by camels or carts. No orange groves, orchards or
vineyards were to be seen until one reached the [Jewish] Yabna village. Houses
were mud. Schools did not exist. The western part toward the sea was almost a
desert. The villages in this area were few and thinly populated. Many villages
were deserted by their inhabitants."
As we can see, throughout history, as documented by Arab historians and by foreign observers before 1917, the land was desolate; there were practically no Muslim Arabs in the cities outside of Jerusalem (except 120 Muslims in Nablus); and the number of Muslim Arabs (other than Ottoman Muslims or Christian Arabs) was minuscule, most of them nomadic Bedouins. The difference between these multiple authentic accounts and the falsified Muslim-Arab propaganda is huge, almost beyond imagination.
When the
§
In 1930/31, Lewis French, the British Director of Development
wrote about the Arabs in Palestine : "We found it
inhabited by fellahin (Arab farmers) who lived in mud hovels and suffered
severely from the prevalent malaria... Large areas were uncultivated... The
fellahin, if not themselves cattle thieves, were always ready to harbor these
and other criminals. The individual plots changed hands annually. There was
little public security, and the fellahin's lot was an alternation of pillage
and blackmail by their neighbors, the bedouin (Arab nomads)."
§
The British Hope-Simpson Commission recommended, in 1930,
"Prevention of illicit immigration" to stop the illegal Arab
immigration from neighboring Arab countries.[15]
§
The British Governor of the Sinai (1922-36) reported in the
Palestine Royal Commission Report: "This illegal immigration was not only
going on from the Sinai, but also from Transjordan and Syria ."
§
The governor of the Syrian district of Hauran, Tewfik Bey El
Hurani, admitted in 1934 that in a single period of only a few months over
30,000 Syrians from Houran had moved to Palestine .
§
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill noted the Arab influx.
Churchill, a veteran of the early years of the British mandate in the Holy Land , noted in 1939 that
“far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and
multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry
could lift up the Jewish population.”
The Arab population in the
The Arab
population and growth in
|
The Quran explicitly encourages lying and deception if it helps Muslims achieve a desired goal [16][17][18][19]. To deny the massive invasion of the
§
The grandparents of the author's wife were born in the Holy Land in the 19th century.
They saw with their own eyes how empty the land was at the time. They also
lived through and experienced first-hand the British conquest and the Arab's
massive invasion of the land that started in 1918. This invasion lasted for
only 30 years, and ended in 1948 with the evacuation of the British from the
land and the declaration of the state of Israel .
§
The family names of many Arabs who now occupy the Holy Land reveal their country of
origin: Masri (from Egypt ), Iraqi (from Iraq ), Tarabulsi (from
Tarabulus-Tripoli in Lebanon ), Hourani (from Houran
in Syria ), Husseini (from Jordan ), and Saudi (from Saudi Arabia ).
§
Following the publication of an earlier version of this article,
the author received an email message from a reader who used to work with Arabs
in Gaza and in various villages in the West Bank in the 1970's. In his
email the reader describes friendly discussions about family history with his
Arab co-workers. Most of the co-workers had grandfathers who immigrated to the Holy Land from neighboring
countries.
When
Churchill said that “the Arabs have crowded into the country and
multiplied till their population has increased more than even all world Jewry
could lift up the Jewish population.” was he lying? Churchill was not a
Muslim...
The name "Palestina" is a Latin-Roman name based on the Hebrew Biblical name of the ancient "Philistines" -- "Plishtim" in Hebrew. The translation of this name to English is: "invaders". The Philistines arrived from the Mediterranean islands nearGreece and invaded the land
about 4000 years ago . The Philistines are extinct since approximately 2000
years ago, and have no ancestral or historical relationship to Arabs. Before
1917, during the 400-years rule of the Ottoman empire , the Ottomans did not
call the Holy Land "Palestina". The British
decided to renew this ancient name and called the land "Palestine ". The local Arabs
never called themselves "Palestinians", not even during the British
mandate. Both Arab and British leaders referred to them only as
"Arabs". For example: The Hope-Simpson report[15] published by the British in 1930, contains
the phrase "the number of Palestinian unemployed, whether Arab, Jew or
other...". "Palestinian" was used only as an adjective in
reference to the location and also included Jews. The Arab inhabitants
were always referred to as "Arabs". The word "palestinians"
does not appear anywhere in this report. "Palestinian Arabs",
"Palestinian Jews", and "Palestinian Christians" were
common terms. But, "Palestinians", as a noun, before 1948, was not
yet invented.
After 30 years of invasion, following the end of the British mandate and the declaration of the state ofIsrael in 1948, the Arabs
recognized the fact that they invaded foreign land and invented for themselves
a name in English -- "Palestinians". If the British were to call the
land "New England ", and the local Arabs were to call
themselves "English" would they automatically become English? It is
important to emphasize that the concept of a "Palestinian" to
describe the local Arab residents was invented by the Arabs AFTER the
declaration of the state of Israel . This group of Arabs
who started calling themselves "the Palestinian nation" after 1948,
does not have an original name in their native Arabic language. Is there any
nation in the world which does not have a name in its original native language?
The Arabs who invaded the Holy Land do not have a name in
their native Arabic language because they are not, and have never been, a
unified group or a nation.
Historically, a "Palestinian" people never existed. The fact is that the Arabs who now call themselves by the English name "Palestinians" don't even know what their name is or should be in Arabic. Even Arab leaders and historians have admitted that a "Palestinian" people never existed. For example:
The name "Palestina" is a Latin-Roman name based on the Hebrew Biblical name of the ancient "Philistines" -- "Plishtim" in Hebrew. The translation of this name to English is: "invaders". The Philistines arrived from the Mediterranean islands near
After 30 years of invasion, following the end of the British mandate and the declaration of the state of
Historically, a "Palestinian" people never existed. The fact is that the Arabs who now call themselves by the English name "Palestinians" don't even know what their name is or should be in Arabic. Even Arab leaders and historians have admitted that a "Palestinian" people never existed. For example:
§
In 1937, the Arab leader Auni Bey Abdul Hadi told the Peel
Commission: "There is no such country as Palestine . Palestine is a term the Zionists
invented. Palestine is alien to us."
§
In 1946, Princeton 's Arab professor of Middle East history, Philip Hitti,
told the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry: "It's common
knowledge, there is no such thing as Palestine in history."
§
In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, an executive member of the
Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), said in an interview to the Dutch
newspaper Trouw: "The 'Palestinian people' does not exist. The
creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against
the state of Israel ."
§
Joseph Farah, an Arab-American journalist, writes: "The truth
is that Palestine is no more real than Never-Never Land . Palestine has never existed as an
autonomous entity."
§
Walid Shoebat, a former PLO terrorist acknowledged the lie he was fighting
for: “Why is it that on June 4th 1967 I was a Jordanian and
overnight I became a Palestinian? ... we considered ourselves Jordanian until
the Jews returned to Jerusalem . Then all of the sudden
we were Palestinians. They removed the star from the Jordanian flag and all at
once we had a Palestinian flag.”
§
The Syrian dictator Hafez Assad said: "There is no such thing
as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity".
§
Dr. Azmi Bishara, a notable leader of the Arabs in Israel , who fought against the
Israeli "occupation", said in a TV interview[20]: "There is no Palestinian nation. It's a
colonial invention. When were there any Palestinians?" To
see a clip of the interview click here.
The
Arabs who now claim to be natives of the Holy Land have migrated to Palestine
and invaded the land after 1917, from neighboring Arab countries, predominantly
from areas now known as Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia,
and Iraq. None of these countries existed as nations prior to 1913. They were
nothing but a disorganized collection of tribes, constantly terrorizing each
other, trying to seize land from their neighbors. Unfortunately, those Arab
invaders, imported into the Holy Land their age-old
"culture" of terrorizing neighbors to seize land. Many of them were
social outcasts and criminals who could not find jobs in their own countries so
they searched for their luck elsewhere. Some of them were accepted by the
British regime as a source of cheap labor and were allowed to settle on
unoccupied Jewish land. Even Yassir Arafat, the leader of the PLO, is not a
native of the Holy Land . He called himself a "Palestinian
refugee" but spoke Arabic with an Egyptian dialect. He was born in 1929 in
Cairo , Egypt . He served in the
Egyptian army, studied in the University of Cairo , and lived in Cairo until 1956. He then
moved to Saudi-Arabia and founded the Al-Fatah terror organization, the
precursor to the PLO, in Kuwait in 1958, together with
his Saudi-Arabian friends. How exactly does that constitute a "Palestinian
refugee"? Being born in 1929 in Cairo , he cannot even be
considered a son of Palestinian refugees (there were no refugees in 1929).
Arafat must have been a good student of Muhammad, the founder of the Muslim
religion, who said in the Quran: "War is deception".[16]
In their propaganda, the Arabs who now call themselves "Palestinians" consistently demand thatIsrael and the world recognize
their "pre-1948" rights. That's about 60 years ago. Mysteriously,
they are never willing to add another 60 years to their "historical"
claims on the Holy Land . They know very well that doing so will send
them back to where they came from - Jordan , Syria , Egypt , Lebanon , Kuwait , Saudi Arabia , and Iraq . Years ago, during
negotiations with the, so-called, "Palestinians", a Israeli
negotiator proposed to revise a mention of their claim of "pre-1948"
rights and replace it with "pre-1917". The "Palestinians"
vehemently opposed. Now we know why.
If there is anyone who still believes that a "Palestinian" nation ever existed before the end of the British mandate and the founding of the state of Israel, would they please be kind enough to answer when was it founded and by whom? What was its name in Arabic (not in Latin-English)? What was its form of government? What were its borders? Name one top "Palestinian" leader before Arafat? Which country ever recognized its existence and when? In which library or museum can we find any of its literature, coins, or historical artifacts? The answer to all these questions is "nil". As stated by Zahir Muhsein: "The 'Palestinian' people does not exist."
Some Arabs consider themselves the descendants of Abraham, the forefather of the Jewish nation. Ironically, if not for Muhammad's study of the Bible, the Arabs would not have known of the existence of Abraham. Muhammad invented the Muslim religion in the 7th century AD, inSaudi Arabia . He studied the Bible
in order to be better equipped in his attempts to persuade the Jews to follow
his newly invented religion. When the Jews refused, he dictated the stories of
the Quran (the Muslim bible) to his students, and filled it with his own
imaginary accounts of Biblical events. (Muhammad himself did not know how to
read or write.) He even took the liberty to change the God-given day of rest,
Saturday - the Sabbath. Since Sunday was already taken by the Christians, he
picked Friday as the next-best Muslim day of rest.
Muhammad never visitedJerusalem and the Holy Land , and did not consider
them important enough to mention their name in the Quran even once. By
comparison, Mecca and Medina , the only two Muslim
holy cities, are mentioned in the Quran hundreds of times. Even though the name
of the Holy Land is not mentioned in the Quran, the Quran
refers to the Holy Land many times as the land of the children of Israel .[21] [22][23][24].
In their propaganda, the Arabs who now call themselves "Palestinians" consistently demand that
If there is anyone who still believes that a "Palestinian" nation ever existed before the end of the British mandate and the founding of the state of Israel, would they please be kind enough to answer when was it founded and by whom? What was its name in Arabic (not in Latin-English)? What was its form of government? What were its borders? Name one top "Palestinian" leader before Arafat? Which country ever recognized its existence and when? In which library or museum can we find any of its literature, coins, or historical artifacts? The answer to all these questions is "nil". As stated by Zahir Muhsein: "The 'Palestinian' people does not exist."
Some Arabs consider themselves the descendants of Abraham, the forefather of the Jewish nation. Ironically, if not for Muhammad's study of the Bible, the Arabs would not have known of the existence of Abraham. Muhammad invented the Muslim religion in the 7th century AD, in
Muhammad never visited
The Jewish Holy Temple stood on Temple Mount long before the Muslim
religion, or any other current world religion was conceived. Even when the
founders of the Christian religion walked around in the streets of ancient Jerusalem there were no mosques
nor churches there - only the Jewish Holy Temple and nothing else. The land of
the Jewish Holy Temple in Jerusalem was purchased by King
David, for the Jewish people, approximately 850 years BCE. The deed, the name
of the previous owner, and the purchase price were recorded in the Bible (See
Samuel-B Ch. 24 and Chronicles-A Ch. 21-22).
Today the Muslim "Palestinians" claim to ownTemple Mount , the site of the Jewish
Holy Temple in Jerusalem . They claim it is
"their" holy site. Does anyone in the rest of the world know which
way the Muslims in Jerusalem face when they pray?
When the Muslims in Jerusalem pray in their mosques,
even in the "Al Aktza" mosque built on the edge of Temple Mount , they actually stand
with their back turned to Temple Mount . And, when they bow
down in their prayers they show their behind to the site of the Holy Temple . How consistent is that
with considering it a Muslim holy site?
Today the Muslim "Palestinians" claim to own
The Muslims
have long ago recognized that the Holy Temple is a Jewish holy site.
Its name in Arabic is "Al Quds" - "The Holiness" in
English, which is an abbreviation for "The House of Holiness" -
The Jewish Holy Temple. The fact is that Jerusalem is not important enough
to the Muslims to be mentioned even once in the Quran, while Mecca and Medina , the only two Muslim
holy cities, are mentioned hundreds of times. Even when the Jordanians occupied
Jerusalem , up until 1967, they never considered it
their capital, and Arab leaders did not come to visit.
Can any Muslim in the world produce any credible evidence for their connection to this holy site, other than in Muhammad's dream? Believe it or not, the one and only source for the Muslim's claim to Jerusalem and the site of the Holy Temple, is a mention in the Quran of a dream that Muhammad had about an unknown "far distant place (mosque)"[25]. This "far distant place (mosque)" could not have been in
The best reference for understanding the Muslim-Arab mentality and politically-motivated falsification of history is Muhammad's own advice to his followers: "War is deception"[16][17][18][19].
The real problem facing those Arabs today is not the lack of a homeland. The historical root-cause of their problem and frustration is the fact that the countries they came from have not agreed to accept them back in. This is why so many of them live, up until today, in refugee camps, in neighboring Arab countries, lacking fundamental civil rights. In their frustration they feel that the only hope and choice they have is to try and steal a country. Many of the vehicles and the agricultural equipment in the Palestinian Authority have been stolen from their Israeli neighbors. For a while,
There is only one possible solution to the "Palestinians" desire for a homeland. It is the only solution that will satisfy their claim of the right to return to their homeland. Since helping them return to where they lived for less than 30 years is their own definition of justice, then helping them return to where they lived earlier for hundreds or thousands of years is, by the same definition, a better justice. Let's all help them get the better justice they deserve. Let's help them return to where they came from -
Recent proposals have suggested a two-state solution to the Israeli-Arab conflict - one for the Jews and one for the Arabs. The map below shows that a much more generous solution already exists - 21 states - one for the Jews and twenty for the Arabs.
The Quran contains more than 100 verses commanding Muslims to fight a war against non-Muslims[26]. Some verses command Muslims to chop off heads and fingers and terrorize and kill non-Muslims[27]. Other verses command Muslims to take land away from non-Muslims[14]. Muslims are also prohibited from living in peace with non-Muslims on non-Muslim land[28]. Anyone who avoids fighting against non-Muslims is punished. Because of such religious commandments, there is no chance and no hope that Muslims will ever live peacefully together with non-Muslims who live on non-Muslim land. Temporary periods of calm are nothing but a waiting period - waiting in ambush - waiting for an opportunity to strike[29].
History proves that a population exchange is the only possible solution, other than war, to conflicts between Muslims and non-Muslims. For example, in 1923, the war between
More than 800,000 Jews have relocated out of the Arab countries; about 600,000 moved to
Unknown to most of
the world population, the origin of the "Palestinian" Arabs' claim to
the Israel-Palestine Land spans a period of a meager 30-50 years
At the beginning
of the 20th century, there were practically no Arabs in the Holy Land . Historically, a "Palestinian"
people never existed. The English name "Palestinian", to describe the
local Arab population, was invented AFTER the establishment of the State of
Israel in 1948. These Arabs do not even have a native name to describe
themselves in their own Arabic language. The Arabs who now claim to be natives
of the Holy Land have migrated to Palestine and invaded the land after 1917, from
neighboring Arab countries. There is only one possible solution to the
"Palestinians" desire for a homeland - let them return to where they
came from - to where they lived earlier for hundreds or thousands of years - to
their real homeland in their original Arab countries.
the 20th century,
there were practically no Muslim Arabs in the Holy Land . By contrast, the Jews, despite 2000 years
of persecution and forced conversions by various conquerors, have throughout
most of history been the majority population there. In Jerusalem Jews were
always the largest demographic group, except for periods when conquerors
specifically threw them out and prevented them from returning.
When General Allenby, the commander of the British military forces, conqueredPalestine in 1917/1918, only a few thousand Muslim
Arabs resided in the Holy Land . Most of the Arabs were Christians, and most of the Muslims in the
area either came from Turkey under the Ottoman Empire , or were the descendants of Jews and
Christians who were forcefully converted to Islam by the Muslim conquerors.
These Muslims were not of Arab origin. Most references to Arabs in Palestine before 1917 refer to the Christian Arabs,
not to the Muslims.
When General Allenby, the commander of the British military forces, conquered
Let me illuminate you.
The Palestinians committed multiple war crimes (and admitted committing them)
against Israel and the ICC didn't
care. Israel responded militarily
(as it has the right to) and the Palestinians hid behind their civilian
population (another war crime) and the ICC didn't care. Now those same people
that have engaged in terror war crimes against Israel have gone the the ICC
and asked it to investigate Israel (the target of the
Palestinian terror war crimes) and the ICC agreed.
If the ICC was honest,
true and impartial:
1. Should it not have
said "No, we will not investigate Israel . You started
everything with multiple war crimes agaisnt Israel and against your own
people, so we will investigate you instead.
That's what the ICC
should have said. Going after Israel is a perversion of
justice. It is what you say happens in the US with black people.
Trayvon Martin...I bet
you believe he was just defending himself. If that was the case, view Israel as Trayvon. He was
followed and attacked. The ICC would investigate Trayvon because Zimmerman's
family asked it to investigate. That's a perversion of justice and a perversion
of the courts.
That's what is
happening with the ICC. The Palestinians (admitted to numerous acts that are
clear war crimes) have asked the ICC (that investigates war crimes) to investigate
the people that were the victims of the Palestinians war crimes. That is
setting a precedent whereby terror supporting states and even terror groups can
abuse the ICC and use it against the same people they are waging terror wars
against.
You way "why are some white
countries".....<---- There is your problem. It's not "white
countries" that are against this. It is "countries that are targets
of terrorism" that are. You see them as white. That's why I say you have
your own racism you are bringing to the table. I don't, so I can see countries
for the countries they are and not label them as black or white as you have to.
Take those glasses off that make you see the world in races. They cloud your
judgement and fill you with hate. Be better than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment